Expected result of final qualifying work example. Template-example of the thesis (sample thesis in economics)

Competencies of a university graduate as a cumulative expected result upon completion of training in the “Organization Management” profile:

· possession of a culture of thinking, the ability to perceive, generalize and analyze information, set a goal and choose ways to achieve it (OK-5),

· ability to construct oral and written speech logically, logically, and clearly (OK-6),

· ability to analyze socially significant processes and phenomena (OK-13),

ability to design organizational structure, carry out the distribution of powers and responsibilities on the basis of their delegation (PC-2),

· the ability to effectively organize group work based on knowledge of the processes of group dynamics and the principles of team formation (PC-5),

· ability to assess the conditions and consequences of organizational and management decisions (PC-8),

· possess project management methods and readiness to implement them using modern software(PK-20),

· ability to think economically (PK-26),

· ability to analyze financial statements and make informed investment, credit and financial decisions (PK-40),

· ability to evaluate investment projects under various investment and financing conditions (PC-43),

· ability to find and evaluate new market opportunities and formulate a business idea (PK-48),

· ability to find and evaluate new market opportunities and formulate a business idea (PC-49).

Selection and approval of the theme of the WRC

The choice of topic for a bachelor's thesis is determined by:

The student’s level of knowledge in the main disciplines of the curriculum,

Place of work (base industrial practice) graduate,

Scientific interests of the graduate,

Practical orientation of the WRC.

The subject of the research and development work must be relevant and correspond to the current state and development prospects of the organization (enterprise).

In addition, the topic of the WRC may be of a research nature.

Taking this into account, the topic of the bachelor's work is determined by the student independently, while it is necessary to take into account the possibility of obtaining specific statistical data on the object of scientific research, as well as the availability of special scientific and educational literature on the problems considered in the work.

The main criterion for a graduate to choose a topic for the thesis should be the student’s research interest, as well as the interest of the administration of the enterprise (institution, organization) on the example of which the research is being conducted. If a student clearly understands which topic he can find the most complete and meaningful material on, then, other things being equal, this circumstance can determine the choice of topic.

Approximate topics for final bachelor's theses are presented in Appendix A.

Using the right to choose, the student can propose “his” topic for the thesis subject to the justification of the feasibility of its development. For a graduate who did not take advantage of the right to choose, the topic of the thesis is assigned at the suggestion of the supervisor.

The selection of the topic of the bachelor's work and its approval must be completed before the end of the practical training.

Assigning the topic of the thesis to students upon his written application and upon the recommendation of the Department of Management of Socio-Economic Systems is formalized by order of the rector of the university.

At the same time, by order of the rector, supervisors of bachelor's work are appointed from among professors and associate professors, experienced teachers and researchers of the university. In addition, managers can be researchers and highly qualified specialists from other institutions, organizations and enterprises.

WRC management

The supervisor is appointed to provide the student with theoretical and practical assistance during the preparation and writing of the thesis.

Supervisor:

assists the student in choosing a topic,

gives the task to the student, draws up a plan with him,

provides assistance in choosing methods for analysis and research,

provides qualified advice on the selection of the necessary scientific and educational literature, reference and statistical materials and other sources on the chosen topic,

conducts consultations as necessary,

carries out systematic monitoring of the progress of preparation of bachelor's work,

checks its readiness.

At various stages of preparation and implementation of the project, the tasks of the manager change.

At the first stage, the leader advises how to begin considering the topic, adjusts the work plan and makes recommendations on the list of references.

During the implementation of the project, the supervisor acts as an opponent, points out to the student the shortcomings of argumentation, composition, style, etc., and gives advice on how to eliminate them.

The student must perceive the recommendations and comments of the supervisor creatively. He can take them into account or reject them at his own discretion, since responsibility for the theoretically and methodologically correct development and coverage of the topic, the quality of the content and design of the thesis lies entirely with the student - the author of the work.

At the suggestion of the head, if necessary, the graduating department grants the right to invite consultants for certain sections of work at the expense of the time allocated for the management of the research and development work. Professors and researchers of the university or other enterprises and organizations can be appointed consultants. The consultant checks the relevant part of the work completed by the student and puts his signature on it.

The student - the author of the work - is responsible for the decisions made in the research project and for the correctness of all data provided.

The completed undergraduate thesis, signed by the student and, if necessary, by the advisor, is submitted to the supervisor.

After reviewing and approving the work, the supervisor provides feedback. The review should describe the work done by the student in preparing the thesis for each section. The review provides a comprehensive description of the quality of the bachelor's work, highlights the positive aspects, pays special attention to the previously noted shortcomings that were not eliminated by the student, and motivates the possibility or inappropriateness of submitting a diploma to the State Attestation Commission. In the review, the supervisor also notes the rhythm of the work, the student’s conscientiousness and independence, his activity and creative approach.

Then the VKR is submitted for normative control. In order to bring the work into compliance with the “Requirements for Standard Control”, it is necessary to use the methodological instructions that are posted on the branch’s website www.udgutura.ru in the “Methodological Materials” section.

Having received the mark and signature of the normative inspector, the student, together with a written review from the supervisor, submits the thesis to the Department of Management of Socio-Economic Systems, where, on the basis of the submitted materials, the issue of admitting the student to the defense is decided. In this case, a corresponding entry is made on the title page of the work.

If a decision is made that it is impossible to allow a student to defend himself, a corresponding protocol is drawn up and submitted to the university rector for approval.

Bachelor's thesis accepted for defense is sent for review.

Review of the thesis

To obtain an additional objective assessment of the student’s work, an external review of the bachelor’s work by specialists in the relevant field is carried out.

Experts and managers of state, regional and local authorities authorities, enterprises, institutions, organizations of related industries. Availability higher education the reviewer is required. Professors and teachers from other universities can also be involved as reviewers.

The reviewer is obliged to conduct a qualified analysis of the essence and main provisions of the work being reviewed and reflect in the review:

Relevance of the chosen topic; - independence of approach to its disclosure; - presence of one’s own point of view; - ability to use scientific research methods; - logic of constructing the work and presentation of the material; - degree of validity of conclusions and recommendations; - reliability of the results and their practical significance; - specific comments on the content, conclusions, recommendations and design of the work, indicating sections and pages; - recommendations for assessing the thesis on a four-point system (“excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory”, “unsatisfactory”). The review is written or printed in any form, recommended text volume – 1-1.5 pages. The review must indicate your full name. reviewer, his academic degree, academic title, place of work, position. The reviewer signs the review and marks the date it was written. The reviewer's signature must be certified by the seal of the organization in which he works. The review is not filed with the work, but is attached to it. The thesis with the review, the supervisor’s review must be submitted to the department no later than 7 days before the start of the work of the State Attestation Committee for the defense. Making changes to the final qualifying work after receiving the review is not allowed.

At the defense of the work at the State Attestation Commission, it is advisable to additionally submit a review of the organization for whose order the work was carried out. It should indicate the practical value of the results obtained and the stage of their implementation.

On the eve of the defense, the Chairman of the State Attestation Committee gets acquainted with the content of the thesis, feedback from managers and reviews.

VCR protection

The student, having received positive feedback from the supervisor, a review from an external reviewer and the decision of the Department of Management of Socio-Economic Systems on admission to defense, must prepare a report for 4-5 minutes, in which he must clearly and concisely outline the main provisions of the work. It should be taken into account that usually the basis for preparing a report (speech) is the conclusion of the WRC.

For clarity, it is necessary to prepare illustrative material of at least 5 pages with graphs, tables, diagrams (for each member of the commission), which make it possible to specify the main provisions of the report.

The report itself and its illustrations (handouts) must be agreed upon with the head of the WRC.

The report follows:

indicate relevance topics of work,

list the issues and problems of the functioning of the WRC facility identified during its implementation,

justify the choice management decision and prove its effectiveness.

The success of the defense largely depends on the quality of the report, so the issue of its preparation is very serious.

The defense is carried out at a meeting of the State Examination Commission. It consists of highly qualified university teachers, and in some cases, specialists from enterprises and organizations. The composition of the commission is approved by order of the university rector.

The committee meeting may be attended by the heads of the research and development work, reviewers, as well as students and interested parties.

The order of defense is as follows: first, the student makes a report, then the supervisor’s review and review are read out, after which the student responds to the comments made in the review and review.

For each WRC, the commission asks questions. In addition, the student’s supervisor, reviewer, and everyone present can ask questions to the student. It should be kept in mind that answers to questions should be concise, clear and convincing. The assessment for the examination is given by the commission at the end of the working meeting. At the same time, the issue of assigning appropriate qualifications to successfully defended students is being resolved. Also, the commission can express a special opinion on a number of works - recommend for implementation, recommend the author for admission to a master’s program, recommend preparing an article based on the project materials, etc.

The decision of the State Examination Committee is final. 2. Structure of the WRC

Introduction– this is the introductory part of the thesis, in which the theoretical and practical relevance of the chosen topic is substantiated, the object of the work is determined, its purpose and objectives are formulated, and a brief summary of the main sections is given. The introduction volume is up to 3 pages.

Main part The thesis includes several sections (chapters), the number of which depends on the chosen topic and is determined by the student in agreement with the supervisor. It is recommended to form 3 chapters in the main part of the work.

To the first chapter it is advisable to include consideration of the following issues

General characteristics of the organization,

Managment structure,

Organizational personnel and the effectiveness of their use,

External environment (suppliers, consumers, competitors) and marketing in the organization,

Analysis of the dynamics of the main economic performance indicators for 2 years.

Giving general characteristics organization, it is advisable to state a short history its formation and development, formulate the goals and objectives of the activity, give a brief description of the products (works, services).

When considering the issue of managing an organization, it is necessary to characterize the organizational structure, highlighting management-level units, main production units, auxiliary units, and also characterize the interrelations of units in the organization.

One of the essential characteristics of an organization is its dependence on the external environment. In this regard, it is necessary to imagine the external environment itself and consider its impact on the activities of the organization. At the same time, it is important to identify the most significant factors of external influence and effective ways responding to them.

In the second chapter necessary:

Identify the main problems in activities of the organization,

Of all the problems, highlight 1, maximum 2 most relevant for the organization,

Consider theoretical questions on the topic of SRS,

Develop options for solving the identified problem,

Conduct an analysis of the proposed options,

Select the most appropriate management option for solving the problem.

The development of options for solving a problem involves the formation of 2 or more management decisions.

The formation of management decision options should be accompanied by theoretical study of relevant issues. In this case, it is necessary to assess the degree of knowledge of the problem(s) posed, consider controversial issues, and analyze domestic and foreign experience. Consideration of theoretical issues on the topic of work involves the study of about 10 literary sources, which should include monographs of the most authoritative experts on the research problem, articles in scientific journals, and publications on the Internet. Links to sources in the text of the work are required. Based on the analysis, the author’s own point of view of the final work should be formed, the most important points for the development of the chosen field should be listed, taking into account which management solutions to the problem will be formed.

When identifying the main problems of activity in functional areas of management (production, marketing, infrastructure, etc.), it is advisable to conduct a SWOT analysis and build a “problem tree”.

In the third chapter management decisions are selected and justified.

Each solution option proposed in the second chapter must contain

Description of the essence of the proposed solution,

Quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the design solution according to possible results and required costs of all types of resources (material, labor, financial, etc.),

Characteristics of sources of resource formation,

Analysis of strengths and weaknesses design solution,

Characteristics of risks design solutions,

Duration project implementation,

Conduct an economic justification for the project (management decision).

On this basis, a management decision is selected - a project aimed at solving the problem(s) posed. Main: It is necessary to provide clear evidence in favor of the decision being made.

After the choice of the final solution has been made, it is necessary to propose a plan for implementing the project.

Conclusion should contain the main conclusions obtained during the implementation of the WRC. In this section it is advisable to include brief conclusions based on the results of the analysis of the organization’s activities, the main problems of the organization’s management, a brief description of the proposed management solution and the results of calculations for its economic justification.

Bibliography is integral part final work and shows the degree of study of the problem, includes sources used by the author when studying the topic and writing the work and is drawn up in accordance with the requirements of GOST 7.1.

IN applications materials are brought out that make the main part easier to perceive without overloading it. Applications contribute to broader coverage of the topic, however, the main text of the work should be created in such a way that it is self-sufficient and contains a small number of applications. The content and form of the application can be very different: copies of documents, excerpts from reporting materials, tables, graphs, diagrams, etc. The main test of the work must contain links to all applications provided.

APPENDIX A

Options for final qualifying work topics

1. Comprehensive assessment current state and development prospects.

2. Organizational and economic aspects of improving corporate governance.

3. Improving the management structure in the organization.

4. Development of a strategic management project in the organization.

5. Project development operational management In the organisation.

6. Improving the quality management system in the organization.

7. Improving the cost management system in the organization.

8. Business plan and its role in improving management.

9. Ways to improve the efficiency and quality of management.

10. Strategic analysis of the external environment of the enterprise.

11. Resource management and assessment of the effectiveness of their use.

12. Analysis of crisis trends in the organization’s activities.

13. Designing the diversification of the organization’s activities.

14. Ways to strengthen the financial condition of the organization.

15. Improving the management of the organization's working capital.

16. Improving the mechanism for the formation, distribution and use of profits.

17. Risk management in the organization.

18. Development of the organization's innovative potential.

19. Improving investment activities in the organization.

20. Development and economic justification of an investment project.

21. Organization and improvement of marketing in the corporate management system.

22. Study of pricing factors for products and services.

23. Research of needs, demand and supply for goods and services.

24. Forecasting demand for goods and services.

25. Organization and development of Internet marketing in the organization.

26. Ways to increase the competitiveness of an organization.

27. Strategy and tactics of personnel management.

28. Increasing the efficiency of managerial work in the organization.

29. Analysis and design of a system for motivating activities in an organization.

30. Development logistics system supply and sales in the organization.

31. Development and economic justification of an organizational project for creating a small business enterprise.

32. Development and economic justification of a business project.

33. Improving the information support of the management system.

34. Improving the foreign economic activities of the organization.

35. Formation of corporate culture in the organization.

36. Analysis and design of communications in an organization.

APPENDIX B

“Improving the cost management system in the organization”

Introduction

1.3. Managment structure.

1.4. Personnel and its use.

1.6. Dynamics of main economic indicators.

Chapter 2. Problems of cost management and ways to solve them

2.1. Organizational cost analysis

2.2. Theoretical issues of determining factors and reserves for cost reduction

2.3. Identification of the main problems of cost reduction in the organization and construction of a “problem tree”.

2.4. Development of options for management decisions to reduce costs.

Chapter 3. Selection and justification of a decision (project) to reduce costs in an organization.

3.4. Selecting a management solution (project) and assessing the possibility of reducing costs.

3.5. Project implementation plan.

Conclusion

Bibliography

Applications

“Ways to strengthen the financial condition of an organization”

Introduction

Chapter 1. Current state of the organization.

1.1. History of creation and development, organizational and legal form, goals and activities.

1.2. Characteristics of manufactured products (work performed, services provided).

1.3. Managment structure.

1.4. Personnel and wages.

1.5. External environment and marketing in the organization.

1.6. Dynamics of main economic indicators

Chapter 2. Problems of strengthening financial condition and ways to solve them

2.1. Analysis of financial condition.

2.2. Theoretical issues of determining directions for strengthening financial condition

2.3. Identification of the main problems of strengthening the financial condition of the organization and construction of a “problem tree”.

2.4. Development of options for management decisions to strengthen financial condition.

Chapter 3. Selection and justification of a decision (project) to strengthen financial condition.

3.1. Calculation of resource requirements for the implementation of proposed solutions.

3.2. Sources for generating resources for implementing solutions.

3.3. Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed solutions.

3.4. Selecting a management decision (project) and opportunities to improve financial condition.

3.5.Project implementation plan.

Conclusion

Bibliography

Applications

Related information.

This article contains an example of the structure of a final qualifying work ( thesis/ project or bachelor's / master's thesis) - from introduction to appendices.

Here you can download the template of the final qualifying work:

By completing the sections of this example template step by step, you will get the job you need. Then you only need to formalize it according to the methodological instructions of your university.

For questions you can contact here: Alexander Krylov

So. Structure

TITLE SHEET OF THE GRADUATE QUALIFICATION WORK

You take this sheet from methodological guidelines for the implementation of research and development work, which the university provides you

Also need to see guidelines for design text documents , there are indicated:

— Margin sizes (usually the same on all sides - for example, 2 cm, and the right margin is almost always 1 cm)

— Font size 14, spacing 1.5, font itself – Times New Roman

— Insert page numbers. They are usually placed at the bottom center, there is no number on the title page

Before and after each heading, press Enter so that there is one blank line between the heading and the text before and after it.

Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………

Chapter 1. Theoretical review on the topic of WRC……………………………………………..

1.1. Review of the essence of the chosen topic of the WRC …………………………………………

1.3. Industry specific features of the WRC topic …………………………………………

Chapter 2. Analysis of the state and activity of the object (enterprise) from the point of view of the topic of the research and development work in accordance with the methods from clause 1.2……………………………………………………………………

2.1. a brief description of and main indicators of the condition and activity of the facility …………………………………………………………………………………………

2.2. Complex economic or the financial analysis activities of the facility …………………………………………………………………………………………

2.3. Analysis on the topic of the WRC ……………………………………………………………

Chapter 3. Design of measures to improve the operation of the facility in the direction chosen in the WRC ……………………………………………………………

3.1. Conditions and prerequisites for developing activities ………………………….

3.2. Name of event 1 …………………………………………………

3.3. Name of event 2………………………………………………………………

3.4. Name of event 3 ………………………………………………….

3.5. Assessing the effectiveness of the set of proposed measures……………

Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………

List of used literature………………………………………………………

Applications…………………………………………………………………………………

INTRODUCTION

Relevance. Why did you choose this topic? A couple of paragraphs, total size - approximately 70% of the first page of the introduction

The purpose of the final qualifying work(more details about the goals here:)

Tasks of the WRC:

First task
Second task
Usually there are 5-7 of them

Object of study in the WRC – the organizational and legal form and the name of the object of work. For example, LLC “Senior Lecturer Alexander Krylov”

Subject of study– what comes after the first word “improvement” or “improvement” from the WRC topic. If there is no such word in the title of the topic, then the subject of research is usually the first phrase

For example, the topic “Improving the financial condition of an enterprise (using the example of Diplom 35 LLC)”

Then the subject of research in the WRC is financial condition enterprises

Research methods- the methods you used in your work. Personally, since I am a former senior lecturer in financial management, I write here all the time financial ratio method. It is reasonable to fill out this item after writing the entire work.

By the way. Sami financial ratios, as well as financial analysis in general, can be calculated for free using this link: http://anfin.ru/finansovyj-analiz-esli-net-dannyh/.

Practical significance of WRC– is not present in all works. Here we write what a theoretical review of work can be used for, how you can use the results of the analysis, and how realistic it is to use VKR activities at the enterprise

Work structure– this section is also not always available. But if there is, then we write here: the final qualifying work consists of an introduction, the main part, a conclusion, a list of used sources and literature, and applications. The main part contains a theoretical overview that reveals the topic of the final qualifying work, an analytical section that allows you to perform an assessment current state object of research, the design part containing a list of measures to improve the subject of research with calculations confirming their economic feasibility

The introduction is 3-5 pages long, no more is required.

CHAPTER 1. THEORETICAL REVIEW ON THE TOPIC OF WRC

1.1. Review of the essence of the selected WRC topic

1.2. Methods and approaches to measuring indicators characterizing the topic of WRC

1.3. Industry specific features of the WRC topic

You can read an article on how to prepare the first part of your final qualifying work here:. Where to get the theory - here:

CHAPTER 2. ANALYSIS OF THE STATE AND ACTIVITY OF THE OBJECT (ENTERPRISE) FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE TOPIC OF WRC IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE METHODS FROM P. 1.2

2.1. Brief description and main indicators of the condition and activity of the facility

2.2. Comprehensive economic or financial analysis of the facility’s activities

In this section, based on the initial data, general analysis enterprises.

Regardless of the topic, you can conduct the following types of analysis:

2.3. Analysis on the topic of WRC

This section provides specific analysis for the topic of the work. You have to either come up with it yourself, or look for a ready-made one and remake it to suit your topic of work

CHAPTER 3. DESIGN OF MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE FACILITY’S ACTIVITIES IN THE DIRECTION SELECTED IN THE WRC

3.1. Conditions and prerequisites for the development of events

In this section we write conclusions on the analysis from the second chapter, since they are the conditions and prerequisites for the development of activities. This particular section may be located at the end of the second part - there it will be called “Conclusions”. Or it can be at the end of the second part, and at the beginning of the third. It depends on what your manager recommends.

You can read about the events for the third part here: . There are many events, you can come up with them yourself. In addition, they can be recommended by your supervisor or a representative of the subject of work, that is, for example, the head of a department of the enterprise, who can subsequently write a review of your work ()

3.2. Name of event 1

Here you describe how to implement the first event, what resources are required for it, what the deadlines for implementation are, justify the costs and planned income, describe the possible effect

3.3. Name of event 2

Here you proceed similarly for the second event

3.4. Name of event 3

Well, here you are describing the third event

3.5. Assessing the effectiveness of a set of proposed measures

Here you describe at least the following indicators - for all events at once:

— One-time costs

— Fixed costs

— Variable costs

— Income

Based on these indicators, you calculate the indicators economic efficiency. At a minimum this:

— Profitability of a set of measures

— Change in the efficiency of the W&R facility as a result of the implementation of measures

- Payback period

At the end of this section, draw conclusions about the extent to which the activities you proposed allowed you to achieve the goal of your final qualifying work.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion you:

— Draw conclusions on achieving the goal

— Draw conclusions on all chapters, confirming them with analysis and project figures

— Describe options for using the results of research and development experiments

— Describe options for further research for which your thesis can become the basis

LIST OF REFERENCES USED

This is insanity, of course, but often works are sent for rework if the list of more than 30 sources contains more than 5 sources released 5 years ago. It’s somehow naive to think that the opinion of a dozen modern analysts who wrote their articles a year ago can even come close to the weight of the opinion of Henry Ford, who was the first to use the assembly line, Jack Trout, who came up with the concept of product positioning, or Jack Welch, the legendary CEO of General Electric.

During Jack Welch's two decades in office, from 1981 to 2001, the corporation's total value increased 30-fold, from $14 billion to nearly $400 billion. General Electric has become the second most profitable company in the world. After leaving GE in 2001, Welch wrote his autobiography, JACK: Straight From The Gut, which became a bestseller.

And for using such a book and indicating the date of its publication, your job can be “wrapped up.” Therefore, adjust the release dates of information sources.

APPLICATIONS

APPENDIX A

In most economic works, Appendix A will be the balance sheet of the object of study for three years.

APPENDIX B

The following applications will be located:

— Large illustrations (more than half a page in size)

— Large tables (more than 70% of the page in size)

All applications must be mentioned in the text of the WRC.

All applications in the text of the work must have links.

The number of applications and their size are usually not limited.

Materials for final qualification (diploma, bachelor's, master's), coursework and reports on practice in economics, financial management and analysis:

The second chapter of the thesis on economics is usually called as part of the title of the thesis, but with the addition of the words “analysis, assessment, diagnosis,” etc. to the beginning of the title. For example,…
Good afternoon, dear reader. In this article I will talk about how to write the introduction of a thesis. The introduction is written after drawing up the plan for the thesis. After writing the introduction...
The third chapter of a thesis (bachelor's or specialist's) usually consists of three subsections. Its title is often similar to the title of the thesis topic and begins with words like...
There are several options for where to get the balance sheet and financial statements for your thesis. Well, for any other economic work too. If you…
In order to evaluate the results of implementing activities in the third chapter of the thesis, it often makes sense to come up with a forecast balance sheet and a financial performance report. What is this for…Good day to you. In this article we will consider what to write in the conclusion of an economic work - a diploma, dissertation or ordinary course work. The total volume of the conclusion is about...
Here you can read customer reviews about working with me, and also see the cost of economic dissertations. Reviews first. Names, as you understand, cannot be given...

The final qualifying work must contain:

1. title page,

2. task for the master's project,

3. review of the WRC,

4. review of the thesis,

6. introduction,

7. main part (at least two main sections, each of which includes at least three subsections);

8. conclusion,

9. bibliography (list of normative legal acts and literature),

10. applications.

The work is presented in bound form and on electronic media.

Requirements for the content of the research project:

1. Introduction is an important part of the WRC, which should consider the following issues:

Justification of the theoretical relevance and practical significance of the selected topic;

Formulation of work goals and, in connection with this, identification of tasks whose solution is necessary to achieve it.

The formulation of the object and subject of research is given. The subject of the research should indicate the area with which the WRC topic is related. For example, in the specialty 38.02.01 Economics and accounting (by industry), such an area could be: the accounting policy of the organization, the procedure and features of accounting for individual objects, audit and analysis of economic and financial activities, taxation features, the procedure for organizing document flow.

In the specialty 02/38/07 Banking, such an area can be: the procedure for organizing document flow, the procedure and features of accounting for individual objects, methods for assessing the creditworthiness of a client of credit institutions, the safety of banks, features of banking operations, financial management in credit institutions, etc.

The object of research is the organization on whose factual material the research is being conducted.

The introduction should not exceed 2-3 pages.

2. First section of the WRC represents a theoretical part of the work in which the student analyzes the current state of the issue under study and the degree of its elaboration. In this section, depending on the topic of research, it is necessary to conduct a critical analysis of various opinions on the issue under study and give your own assessment of the controversial issues or summarize the existing practice in resolving this issue, including its legislative support, as well as formulate possible ways to effectively solve the problems.

3. Second section of the WRC usually it is computational and analytical, i.e. practical part of the work. It provides information about the organization, allowing for the further compilation of its technical and economic characteristics, and provides information about accounting policy, rules for document management, features of accounting and management accounting, analysis of financial and economic activity based on the forms of financial statements, the results of the audit report, financial security economic activities, applied calculation methods. An analysis of the state of the issue (problem) under study in a specific organization is carried out on the basis of analytical tables and graphs.

In section 2, the problems of the organization under study related to the topic under study are necessarily identified, unused reserves of the organization are identified, and recommendations are formulated to improve the efficiency of the organization. At the end of the section, conclusions are formulated.

The second section of the WRC should have a volume of approximately 25-30 pages.

4. B Conclusion The WRC provides all the main conclusions and achieved results of all the work, recommendations regarding the possibilities of applying the results obtained. In this case, special mention should be made of the degree to which the goals have been achieved, the student’s personal contribution to the results obtained or the improvement of the resulting indicators.

The volume of the “Conclusion” is about 3–4 pages.

5. B bibliography regulatory legal acts, scientific works, articles and other sources used in writing the work, indicating the names, initials of the authors, title of the work, names of publishers, year and place of publication.

6. B applications The WRC contains materials confirming the reliability of the research carried out, for example, summary tables, graphs, calculations performed on the basis of well-known methods, as well as other documents essential for this work. For example, the developed provisions on structural divisions organizations, job descriptions For individual categories employees, completed samples of applied primary documents, document flow schedule, accounting registers, order on accounting policies, reporting forms used to analyze financial and economic activities, etc.

In general, when writing the main sections of the WRC, you must follow the following recommendations:

1. The names of chapters and subsections must correspond to the topic of the WRC.

2. The names of subsections must correspond to the title of the chapter.

3. The conclusions of each section, summarizing the material presented, should serve as a logical transition to the next section.

4. It is necessary to comply with the compliance of the text part of the WRC and the tabular, graphic and calculation materials provided, both in terms of their volumes and the necessary comments.

5. When writing the WRC, the use of outdated normative legal acts is unacceptable, except in cases where there is a comparison with new edition document.

The total volume of the proposal should not exceed 35-45 pages. Applications are not included in the total scope of the WRC.

7. The examination paper is drawn up in accordance with the Guidelines for the preparation of text educational documents for students of all specialties and forms of study

The procedure for protecting VKR

1. Students who have successfully completed the full mastery of the basic course are admitted to the final state certification educational program who have successfully passed the intermediate certification tests and are allowed to defend their final qualifying works. Admission is issued by order of the director of the institute.

2. The defense of the thesis is carried out at an open meeting of the State Examination Commission for the specialty. The operating procedure of the State Examination Committee is determined by the Regulations on the State Examination Commission.

3. The public defense procedure provides for:

Hearing feedback from the head of the graduate work, describing the degree of mastery of professional and general competencies, as well as the personal qualities of the graduate;

Listening to a review assessing the content of the work;

Graduate report;

Questions for the graduate regarding the work submitted for defense;

Listening to the graduate’s answers to questions and comments from members of the State Examination Committee on the graduate work;

The graduate’s responses to comments on the graduate work;

4. The report must contain:

Statement of the problem and assessment of its relevance;

The purpose and objectives that were set in the process of performing the work;

The main results of the study for each of the formulated objectives of the WRC;

During the report, the student must refer to the handouts, which are handed over to the members of the State Examination Committee before the start of the report.

· statement sheet, which indicates the name of the topic, the author of the work, the supervisor and consultants, the purpose and objectives of the study;

· characteristics of the subject and object of research;

· research methodology aimed at achieving the goal of the research project;

· results of analysis of the assigned tasks and main conclusions;

5. Upon completion of the defense procedure at a closed meeting of the State Examination Committee, a decision is made on the assessment of the WRC by a simple majority of votes of the commission members participating in the meeting.

The results of the defense are determined by the grades “excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory”, which are announced on the day of the defense.

Members of the state examination commission in the minutes of the meeting on the defense of Final qualifying works may express a special opinion on the level of theoretical and practical research in individual Final qualifying works.

When assessing the results of the defense, members of the State Examination Committee are guided by the content of the thesis, the relevance of the chosen topic, the quality of the report, calculation and graphic materials, the degree of independence in performing the work, the achievement of set goals, and also take into account the level of general scientific, theoretical and practical training of the graduate student in this specialty.

6. In the event of a student’s failure to appear for the defense of his final qualifying work due to illness, the student is provided medical certificate to the educational part of the secondary vocational education department.

Based on the student’s personal application, he may be given the opportunity to defend his thesis on another day, but during the work of the State Examination Commission.

7. A student who is not admitted to the defense of the thesis or receives an unsatisfactory grade during the defense has the right to submit the thesis for defense again in accordance with the established procedure.

At the student's request, he is issued an academic certificate.

8. All research papers after their successful defense are stored in the archives of the institute. Their copies can be issued to organizations (enterprises) for practical use according to written request the latter.

The issuance of original works from the archive is prohibited.

ANNEX 1

To the Chairman of the Cycle Commission

"General professional and

Special economic disciplines"

G.M. Revenko

from a student of the group ____________

_____________________________

STATEMENT

I ask for permission to write a final qualifying work

The evaluation of the final work consists of several indicators:

Quality of work (level of topic disclosure, theoretical and practical significance, design, etc.);

Quality of presentation (ability to focus on the main points of the study, depth and completeness of answers to questions, orientation in the material).

When assessing the quality of work, the reviewer's assessment and the supervisor's feedback are taken into account.

The results of the defense of the thesis are assessed at a closed meeting of the State Examination Committee at the end of the defense with the marks “excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory” by a simple majority of votes of the commission members participating in the meeting. In case of an equal number of votes, the chairman's vote is decisive. Grades are announced on the same day after the minutes of the State Examination meeting are completed.

A student who receives an “unsatisfactory” grade while defending his thesis is issued an academic certificate.

When assessing the thesis, the supervisor, reviewer, and state examination commission may be guided by the following criteria:

Excellent rating

1) A clear, logical research program has been developed.

2) The relevance and novelty of the chosen topic is convincingly justified.

3) An analytical review of scientific literature is given, scientific-methodological, documentary and other sources are examined. Basic theoretical concepts and ideas are developed clearly, clearly, and reliably.

4) The ability to evaluate different points of view on the essence of the problem being studied is demonstrated, an analysis of advanced pedagogical experience is given and scientific independence and one’s own research position are demonstrated.

5) The hypothesis and research objectives are correctly formulated, adequate methods are selected.

6) Experimental material has been processed in detail and carefully, various illustrated conclusions have been given throughout the work, data from theoretical and practical research have been summarized, and justified guidelines, ways to further study the problem are outlined.

7) The work is correctly and competently designed.

8) The graduate’s speech during the defense is structured logically and consistently.

9) The student’s answers to the questions of the commission members are complete and accurate.

8) Research materials were presented at a conference, seminar, school, etc.

Rated "good"

The work is rated “good” if the above requirements are met, but there are minor deficiencies:

1) The material is not presented convincingly.

2) Few examples are given.

3) There are errors in the design of the work.

4) The list of used literature is insufficient (less than 30 sources), etc.

Rating "satisfactory"

It is awarded if the basic requirements for student research work have been met, but it does not give the impression of a clearly planned, complete and completed study, and also if serious errors have been made or there are significant deficiencies in the design of the work that prevent an adequate assessment of the work done, and (or) the results obtained. Descriptive work is also rated “satisfactory”.

Rating "unsatisfactory"

It can be issued if the requirements for the research project are not met (an analysis of the literature on the research topic, modern theoretical concepts is not presented, the research methods do not correspond to the goals and objectives of the work, etc.).

LIST OF SOURCES USED

1. Federal state educational standard of secondary vocational education in specialty 050146 Teaching in primary school: approved on November 5, 2009 No. 535 - Moscow, 2009. - 44 p.

2. Federal state educational standard of secondary vocational education in specialty 050715 Corrective pedagogy in primary education: approved on October 12, 2009 No. 583. - Moscow, 2009. - 46 p.

3. GOST 7.1 - 2003. Bibliographic record. Bibliographic description of the document. General requirements and drafting rules.

4. GOST 7.80 - 2000. Bibliographic record. Title. General requirements and drafting rules.

5. GOST 7.32 – 2001. Report on scientific research work. Structure and design rules.

6. Regulations on final qualifying work at GAPOU TO: approved on November 6, 2014 No. 301.

7. Berezhnova, E.V. et al.. Fundamentals of educational and research activities of students / E.V. Berezhnova, V.V. Kraevsky. - Moscow: Academy, 2013. – 128 p.

8. Zagvyazinsky V.I. and others. Methodology and methods of psychological and pedagogical research / V.I. Zagvyazinsky, R. Atakhanov. - Moscow: Academy, 2010. – 208 p.

ANNEX 1

Application form

GAPOU TO "Tyumen Pedagogical College"

To the Chairman of the P(C)K

____________________________________

student(s) of _________ course, specialty_______________________ ____________________________________ _____________________________ (full name)

“_____” ___________________ 20 ___

STATEMENT

Please assign me the topic of the qualifying work: _________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

I ask you to appoint the following as the head of the qualification work: _______________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Signature of the supervisor ___________________ signature of the student _____________________

"______" ________________ 20___ "_____ "____________________ 20___

Decision P(C)K________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Protocol No. _______ dated “____” ___________________20__

APPENDIX 2

Task for performing high-tech research

Tyumen region

"TYUMEN PEDAGOGICAL COLLEGE"

I APPROVED

Chairman of the P(C)K

"___"___________20___

EXERCISE

For final qualifying work

student ___________________________________________________________________

groups __________ Specialty _________________________________________________

1. Topic: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

approved by order of the director No. __ dated “___”____________20___

2. The deadline for submitting work to the P(C)K is “__” ___________ 20__.

3. Initial data for performing the work:

3.1. Goal of the work:

_____________________________________________________________________________

3.2. Object of study:

_____________________________________________________________________________

3.3. Toolkit (methods, techniques, etc.):

_____________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

3.4. Main expected results of the work:

1) The theoretical part (chapter) of the final qualifying work, revealing questions about ………….

2) The practical part (chapter) of the final qualifying work, including fragments of lessons and their analysis………..

4. List of issues to be studied:

5. List of illustrative materials:

2)……..

3)……

6. Control schedule for completing the final qualifying work:

7. Consultants on related issues of final qualifying work:

Practice base:

8. Date of issue of the assignment: “____”____________ 20 _

APPENDIX 3

Thesis completion schedule

Speciality __

Group No.

Student's full name __

Thesis topic

___ ___ _______________________________________________________________

Date Student signature

Date Manager's signature

APPENDIX 4

Feedback form

Department of Education and Science of the Tyumen Region

"TYUMEN PEDAGOGICAL COLLEGE"

head of final qualifying work

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Speciality: ____________________________

Assessment of compliance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard for the preparedness of the author of the final work

Requirements to vocational training	Compliant	Mostly consistent	Does not match
Be able to correctly formulate and set tasks (problems) of your activities when performing research and development work, analyze, diagnose the causes of problems, their relevance		+
Set priorities and methods for solving assigned tasks (problems)		+
Be able to use psychological, pedagogical and methodological information - correctly assess and summarize the degree of knowledge of the object of study		+
Know various methods of collecting, storing and processing (editing) information used in the field professional activity	+
Possess modern information, pedagogical and computer technologies and use their capabilities in solving assigned tasks (problems)			+
Be able to rationally plan time for completing work, determine the correct sequence for completing the task	+
Be able to objectively analyze and evaluate the results obtained		+
Be able to draw independent, well-founded and reliable conclusions from the work done		+
Be able to use professional scientific literature		+

Noted advantages of the work: ________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

Disadvantages noted:______________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.

Conclusion: The work meets (does not meet) the requirements and can (cannot) be recommended for defense at a meeting of the state certification commission.

FULL NAME. leader, academic title, degree, position: ___________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

"_____" _____________201__ __________________________ (signature)

APPENDIX 5

Sample standard control sheet

STANDARD CONTROL

Final qualifying work of a student ____________ group ___ specialty ___________________________________________________

Topic of final qualifying work ___________________________________________________________________

Analysis of VKR for compliance with requirements

№	An object	Options	Complies (+) / Does not comply (-)
	Topic name	Corresponds to the approved topic
	Font size	14 kegel
	Font name	Times New Roman
	Line spacing	1,5
	Paragraph	1,25
	Margin (mm)	Left -30 mm, right – 10 mm, top – 20 mm, bottom – 20 mm
	Total scope of work	40-50 pages of printed text
	Pagination	Through, at the bottom of the sheet, on the right in Arabic numerals
	Sequence of structural parts of the work	Title page, Table of contents, Introduction, Main part, Conclusion, References, Appendices.
	Design of structural parts of the work	The table of contents includes the headings of all chapters, paragraphs, applications, indicating the starting pages
Each structural part begins on a new page.
Names are indented with capital letters.
The distance between the title and the text is one line
There is no period at the end of the name
	Quantity and design of literature used	30 bibliographic, reference and literary sources, Internet resources
List of references in alphabetical order
	Making references to literature	References to literature are presented in square brackets ()
Numbering of links is continuous
The number of references in the text corresponds to the list of references used
	Table design
	Design of drawings	Placed after mention in the text

Standard control was carried out by the head of the research and development team _________________ /________________/

I am familiar with the results of standard control: _________________ /________________/

Date ____________

Comments corrected: ______________ /______________________/ _________

(signature) (full name of manager) (date)

APPENDIX 6

Review form

Department of Education and Science of the Tyumen Region

State autonomous professional educational institution

Tyumen region

"TYUMEN PEDAGOGICAL COLLEGE"

Review

for final qualifying work

on the topic of_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________

student(s) ___________________________________________________________________

(full name, group)

Final qualifying work of _______pages, contains tables_______,

drawings ________, applications _________.

1. Dedicated to (relevance and significance of the topic)__________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. Validity of the methodological and methodological apparatus_____________________

__________________________________________________________________

3. Compliance of the content of the work with the topic__________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

4. Theoretical elaboration of the research problem__________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

5. Analysis of the validity of empirical conclusions and recommendations__________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

6. Practical significance of the work_______________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

7. Quality of design______________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

8. Disadvantages of work_______________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

FULL NAME. reviewer, academic title, degree, position _______________________________________________________________________________

«_____» _____________ 201_ _G. __________________________ (reviewer’s signature)

APPENDIX 7

Sample title page

Department of Education and Science of the Tyumen Region

State Autonomous Professional Educational Institution

Tyumen region

"TYUMEN PEDAGOGICAL COLLEGE"

Final qualifying work

by specialty (name of specialty)

(Work theme)

Tyumen, 2015

APPENDIX 8

INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1. THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ORGANIZING COMMUNICATIVE ACTIVITIES OF JUNIOR SCHOOLCHILDREN USING DIDACTIC GAMES
1.1. The role of communicative universal educational actions in the communication of younger schoolchildren
1.2. Characteristic didactic games s as a means of forming communicative universal educational activities among younger schoolchildren
1.3. Methods of using didactic games for the formation of communicative universal educational actions of primary schoolchildren
Conclusions for Chapter 1
CHAPTER 2. FORMATION OF COMMUNICATIVE UNIVERSAL LEARNING ACTIONS OF JUNIOR SCHOOLCHILDREN USING A DIDACTIC GAME
2.1. The results of the study are the levels of formation of communicative universal educational actions in junior schoolchildren at the ascertaining stage of the experiment
2.2. The use of didactic games in lessons to organize communicative activities of primary schoolchildren
2.3. Testing the effectiveness of using didactic games for the formation of communicative universal educational actions in students
Conclusions on Chapter 2
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPLICATION